Month: September 2012
CLT – AmFraser
A Juicy Yield Play
We initiate coverage on Cache Logistics Trust (Cache) with a BUY and a fair value of $1.291 based on DCF. Backed by a quality portfolio of logistics warehouse assets, Cache is well positioned to capture the growth opportunities presented by Singapore’s development as a global logistics hub. Built‐in rental escalation rates of 1.5‐2.5% and the long‐term nature of its triple‐net master lease agreements underpin earnings resilience even in the face of subdued macroeconomic conditions. A forward FY2012‐13 dividend yield of 7.0‐7.3% further accentuates Cache’s attractiveness.
INVESTMENT MERITS
Built‐in rental escalation rates and triple‐net lease structure offer protection against inflation. Cache’s master and multi‐tenanted leases are structured with built‐in rental escalation rates of 1.5% to 2.5%. This, along with its triple‐net master leases, allows Cache to pass on the bulk of its inflationary burden to its master lessees and end‐user tenants.
Backing of a strong sponsor. CWT has provided Cache with a strong pipeline of local and foreign acquisition assets by granting it a Rights of First Refusal (ROFR) on 13 properties, bolstering its inorganic growth plans.
A juicy yield play. The biggest attraction for us is its sustainable FY2012‐13 yield of 7.0‐7.3%. A portfolio of strategic assets, strong underlying occupancy rates and its long‐term triple‐net master lease structure all combine to underpin its earnings stability and thus ensuring the consistency of its attractive dividend yield.
Comfortable debt headroom. Should Cache obtain a credit rating, the company would be able to drive up its aggregate leverage to a maximum of 60%. Amid the current environment of strong liquidity and low interest rates, Cache could be motivated to take on a more aggressive stance on gearing to support its acquisition of desirable assets.
KEY RISKS
Over reliance on master lessees CWT and C&P for rental income. Should CWT Limited and C&P fail to meet their lease obligations, this would severely impact Cache’s bottom‐line and distribution income.
Asset concentration risk. Generating around 40% of its rental revenues from CWT Commodity Hub, Cache is largely exposed to risks that could adversely impact the operations or business of CWT Commodity Hub.
VALUATION
DCF Valuation. We derive a fair value of $1.291 based on a DCF model. Our model factors in a terminal growth rate of 1.5% and is based on the assumptions of a risk‐free rate of 1.38%, a beta of 0.8, and market risk premium of 9.2%.
SREITs – Kim Eng
The allure of S-REITs
Gravity Defying: Highest Yield-Spreads and Returns Globally.
- S-REITs has risen 28.7% YTD, outperforming even major REITs markets such as US, Australia and Japan etc
- We pointed out that S-REITs has one of the highest yield spreads globally in our previous report dated 3 Sep 2012. We took a deeper look at global/regional peers and below are our assumptions and proposed theses why this may be the case:
-
Why Asian REITs have much higher yield spreads.
- The Asian REITs (S-REITs, J-REITs, and HK-REITs, excluding M-REITs), outperformed the non-Asian REITs (US-REITs, UK-REITs, A-REITs) in terms of yield spreads partly due to higher borrowing costs in the West (consequence of US/European deleveraging) and Australia.
- With the exception of M-REITs, the Asian REITs incur average cost of borrowing (sector average) of ~1.5%-3.1%, much lower than the 5.5%-6.9% expensed by non-Asian REITs.
- We noted that despite risk-free rates being low in the US (1.7%) and UK (1.8%), the actual borrowing costs to companies on the ground are relatively higher, compared to Asia. Western banks have become parsimonious in their lending vis-à-vis the robust loan growth situation amongst Asian banks.
- From our observations, A-REITs and UK-REITs have average cost of borrowings much higher than normalized1cap rates, rendering DPU yields to be trading near cap-rates levels. As a result, yield spreads are much lower in comparison. For US-REITs, the high borrowing costs are partly offset by their higher cap rates, but this is still insufficient to cover the 178-211 bps yield spread lag behind Asian REITs (excluding M-REITs).
- In M-REITs case, both the cost of borrowing and risk free rates are much higher than S-REITs, J-REITs and HK-REITs, resulting in much lower yield spreads.
- The Asian REITs (S-REITs, J-REITs, and HK-REITs, excluding M-REITs), outperformed the non-Asian REITs (US-REITs, UK-REITs, A-REITs) in terms of yield spreads partly due to higher borrowing costs in the West (consequence of US/European deleveraging) and Australia.
- What gives S-REITs the edge over other Asian REITs.
-
Higher Capitalization Rates:
- On a sector basis, Singapore has relatively higher normalised2 cap rates (net property income that can be extracted per annum for each S$ dollar invested in investment properties), compared to Hong Kong and Japan.
- For example in HK, cap rates (net basis) for prime office and prime retail buildings on a stabilized basis are around 3%-3.5% and 3.5%-4% respectively. However, in Singapore, cap rates for prime office and prime retail properties are at least 4.0% and 5.0% respectively.
- This enables S-REITs to offer DPU yields of ~6% without trading at price-to-book discount (1.07x PBR). On the other hand, in order to offer DPU yields of ~5%, HK-REITs and J-REITs have to trade at ~0.8x PBR.
Unlikely interest rates hike until end 2014:
- The MAS manages the Sing dollar’s strength by buying or selling currencies to keep its exchange rate against major currencies within a policy band, and by adjusting the band occasionally to steer the exchange rate. This FX-centred monetary policy regime means that Singapore’s short-term interest rates are essentially a function of US short-term interest rates.
- Most economists do not expect any significant interest rates hike until end of 2014, following the US Fed’s intent to keep short-term interest rates near zero till then. If correct, this would imply that the cost of borrowings for S-REITs (some pegged to SIBOR) will stay at current low levels through 2012-2014.
Others reasons:
- The strong SGD, chasing yields climate and lack of investable alternatives in the market are other factors providing price support for S-REITs. Investors are also drawn to the transparency and predictability of S-REIT dividends, particularly in the midst of the external market uncertainty
- On a sector basis, Singapore has relatively higher normalised2 cap rates (net property income that can be extracted per annum for each S$ dollar invested in investment properties), compared to Hong Kong and Japan.
Yields can compress another 70-90 bps (Peak Valuations).
-
S-REITs are presently trading at 5.9% FY12 yield and a yield spread of 463 bps. We think there is downside room for another 70-90 bps compression in view of the following two reasons:
- The S-REITs’ average and stabilized long-term yield spread (excluding the GFC period) is around ~370 bps.
- The effective cap rate for S-REITs is around 5.3%. If we take cap rates as the floor for FY12 DPU yield (since overall S-REITs sector trading at P/B of ~1x), there is another 70 bps for yields to be compressed further.
- The S-REITs’ average and stabilized long-term yield spread (excluding the GFC period) is around ~370 bps.
- A yield-spread compression of another 70-90 bps equates to an average price appreciation of 13%-19% for the sector.
Maintain OVERWEIGHT on S-REITs.
- We conducted a 2QCY12 results round-up and target price update for S-REITs under our coverage. Most S-REITs reported 2QCY12 distributable incomes that were in-line with our forecasts. Moving forward, we expect DPU growth of 1.4%-9.6% per annum over FY11-FY13F (except Suntec REIT which will likely suffer DPU decline due to ongoing refurbishments at Suntec City).
- Our top BUYS remain with the more defensible industrial and retail REITs with total returns of 10%-17%. We think their risk-reward proposition still appear favorable to yield-driven investors. Maintain OVERWEIGHT on the overall S-REITs sector.
ART – CIMB
Global headwinds remain
We returned from a non-deal roadshow more positive on the stock after gaining more clarity on growth potential via asset enhancements and acquisitions. That said, we continue to expect macro headwinds to cap same-store growth and see forex volatility as an overhang.
We revise our assumptions for long-term and AEI-led RevPau growth, and factor in S$100m in acquisitions in 2013/14, adjusting our DPU accordingly. DDM-based target price (8.5% discount rate) also rises. As the stock has done well YTD, we remain Neutral on the lack of strong catalysts.
Allaying investor concerns
Investor concerns were precipitated by the REIT's wide geographic reach. Global outlook was a key concern, with queries targeted at its European portfolio as well as Asia growth opportunities. Concerns were slightly allayed by the nature of the asset class (serviced residence vs. hotels) and structure of leases. Management targets long-staying corporate travellers vs. a more volatile tourist segment. Tourist exposure is limited to 10-20% in Asia and 50% in Europe, with average length of stay at 5-6 months in Asia and <1 month in Europe. Potential earnings volatility in Europe is minimised by master leases and minimum income terms, providing downside protection on >40% of portfolio earnings.
Next phase of growth
With the renovation cycle for serviced residences at 8-10 years, we see AEI potential for older assets. The UK's Citadines Prestige Trafalgar Square, which was recently renovated and rebranded, saw a 30-40% uplift in room rates. Ascott Jakarta is next in line, with expected completion in 1Q13. Management expects a 10-15% average increase in room rates post-AEI. Acquisitions will still focus on Asia (e.g. China, India, Vietnam), through 3rd party and sponsor acquisitions, with the latter seeing S$2bn-2.5bn of assets completing over the next few years. Management will maintain 65:35 Asia/Europe exposure.
Macros still a concern
Macro headwinds are our key concern, as we see growth on 60% of portfolio on management contracts (though limited to Pan Asia exposure) largely capped. Forex volatility is also a worry. We take comfort in recent renewed optimism on ECB action, but remain sceptical on its sustainability. Management caveats it might hedge the Euro depending on conditions.
Cambridge – DMG
A pass at the sale of the year
As previously announced on 2nd and 24th May 2012, Cambridge Industrial Trust (CIT) has joined with other owners of Lam Soon Industrial Building to undertake an ‘en-bloc’ sale of the entire property at an indicative pricing of S$330m (equivalent to an estimated S$950 psf) – 2.5x the valuation of the property on books. Located in Hillview, Upper Bukit Timah, Lam Soon Industrial is a 230,915 sq ft freehold site zoned for residential use with a gross plot ratio of 1.92x. With regards to this matter, CIT has just announced that despite good interests on the property, a mutually agreeable pricing could not be reached and hence the en-bloc sale would not be carried out. Although this is a freehold piece of land, the indicative price may be on the high side after taking the development cost into consideration. Although CIT could have greatly benefitted from this sale, we believe CIT would continue to grow via other acquisitions and AEIs going forward while the management awaits a better time before carrying out another en-bloc sale. Maintain BUY on CIT with a DDM-based (COE: 9.8%, terminal growth: 1.0%) TP: S$0.660.
Selling price might be higher than what the developers are willing to pay. At S$330m, the indicative selling price translates to 2.5x the book value (for 79% ownership) of the property as per December 2011. Assuming a development cost of S$300-400 psf, the total cost of construction could add up to approximately c.S$1300-1400 psf. With the current selling price of S$1400-1600 psf for the residential development across the road of Lam Soon Industrial, coupled with uncertainty in the residential market, we believe the profit margin for developing this particular property may be too low for developers’ consideration.
CIT continues to remain attractive. With an estimated cap rate of 5.2% on this building, CIT could have greatly benefitted from this divestment. However, going forward, we expect CIT’s DPU to continue to remain strong from 1) additional contributions from its acquisitions, 2) resilient industrial rental rates coupled with average security deposits of 12.9 months, 3) the completion of the BTS project at Tuas View Circuit in August 2012 and 4) future AEIs in the pipeline. Maintain BUY on CIT with a DDM-based (COE: 10.7%, terminal growth: 1.0%) TP: S$0.660.
FCOT – OCBC
UPDATES ON PREFERRED UNITS
- Expiry of restriction period
- CPPU redemption likely in FY13
- P/B still attractive at 0.88x
Update on CPPU conversion and redemption
Further to the expiry of the restriction period for redemption and conversion of Series A Convertible Perpetual Preferred Units (CPPUs) on 25 Aug, Frasers Commercial Trust (FCOT) announced that it has not exercised its right to redeem the CPPUs. However, CPPU holders had successfully exercised their right to convert ~1.0m CPPUs at a conversion price of S$1.1845 per unit. We understand that 878,697 new ordinary units will be issued on 1 Oct through the conversion process (0.14% of total units outstanding as at 30 Jun), but they will not be entitled to any distributions on FCOT’s ordinary units declared during the period between 1 Apr and 30 Sep. We estimate that ~341.5m CPPUs will be left in issue post conversion.
KeyPoint sale proceeds likely used to redeem CPPUs
We are currently maintaining our view that FCOT will likely redeem half of its CPPUs as the distribution rate is relatively high at 5.5% of its offer price. The divestment of KeyPoint is expected to be completed by 8 Oct, and will provide FCOT the financial resources to redeem the CPPUs as well as pare down its existing borrowings. As a reference, FCOT had proposed on 24 Apr to sell KeyPoint for a consideration of S$360m, representing a 26.3% premium to its latest valuation of S$285m. This is expected to result in a gain of S$72.8m.
Maintain BUY with unchanged fair value of S$1.23
In view of the CPPU conversion, we now factor in the new ordinary units into our model. Our fair value, however, remains unchanged at S$1.23. We continue to like FCOT for its growth potential, strong execution and attractive P/B of 0.88x. Based on our understanding, FCOT may possibly be in the final stages of discussion with potential tenants to take up most of the remaining 85% space formerly occupied by Marsh & McLennan at China Square Central. This, together with potential interest savings, may likely translate to better financial performance at FCOT’s portfolio going forward. Maintain BUY.