Industrial REITs – DMG

Change in game rule by JTC

Since the beginning of the year, JTC has indicated that property funds, such as REITs, have to pay land premium upfront for all industrial buildings acquisitions from sellers on JTC-leased sites, instead of paying in terms of a monthly land rental. Through this change in rule, REITs will have to set aside a sum of capital for the payment of upfront land premium; thus essentially raising the acquisition costs of industrial buildings. Having said that, we expect some of the REITs to counter this measure via i) lower acquisition price on the property to make up for the upfront land premium and/or ii) requesting the seller of the property to pay a higher leaseback rental to compensate for the land premium having been paid (i.e., a double net versus a triple net rental). Although the long term impact of this change in policy remains to be seen, we believe there will be pressure in the industrial property prices and rentals in the short term.

Minimal change expected to tenants expenditure. Before the change in policy, tenants of industrial properties have been paying the land rental through triple-net tenant agreements. We expect tenants that lease space in newly acquired industrial buildings will have to pay a higher rental rate to make up for the upfront land premium. However, on a net basis, there is little difference in the total amount of rental expenses incurred by tenants, as the amount previously paid for land rental in a triple-net tenant agreements forms part of the new double-net tenant agreements.

REITs may find it trickier to buy new properties. With the change in this policy, industrial REITs will be facing a hurdle in terms of future acquisitions as the capital involved in buying new properties rise. As REITs try to crawl back or offset a portion of these upfront charges (whether through lump sum pro rata basis or discount in acquisition price), there is a likelihood that building owners may choose to sell their buildings to industrialists since it is possible that they can sell the property at a higher price (given that industrialists can continue to pay a monthly land rental under the new policy). In our view, we believe this option to be limited to i) smaller buildings, as industrialists are unlikely to buy over a larger property than they require; ii) when owners of the buildings do not seek to sell and lease back the property for their own use.

Impact of change in policy may not be all bad. After the change in policy, REIT managers will have to factor in the additional capital expenditure into the IRR for any acquisitions. In our view, as long as the IRR can meet each REIT’s requirement, REITs will continue to acquire buildings; particularly on the back of low interest rate and relative ease in financing. In addition, although paying the land premium upfront may translate to a higher initial acquisition cost, this may prove to be cheaper in the long run as land rent paid on a monthly basis are subjected to a 5.5% annual escalation cap. Lastly, it is important to note that this change in policy do not affect BTS projects that some REITs plan to undertake this year.