HPH Trust – BT

Hutchison Port may make weak debut

Analysts say fears of Japan’s N-crisis are spooking markets

Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka Shing’s Hutchison Port Holdings Trust’s US$5.5 billion initial public offering is expected to make a weak debut in Singapore today, as ongoing concerns about Japan’s nuclear crisis spook global markets.

Hutchison Port, a unit of Hutchison Whampoa, priced its IPO at US$1.01, the middle of its indicative range of US$0.91-US$1.08, making it South-east Asia’s largest stock offer and the biggest in Asia so far this year.

Units of Hutchison Port may drop as much as 3 per cent on its first day of trading, analysts and traders said.

‘Hutchison’s IPO may be clouded by ongoing fears about a nuclear meltdown in Japan. Its performance may also be affected by Japan and China’s trade shifts following the earthquake. As such, sentiment may be against Hutchison,’ said Lin Jin Shu, an analyst at SIAS Research.

Fears that Japan’s nuclear crisis may worsen come on top of worries about escalating tensions in the Middle East, undermining investor confidence and sparking a sell-off in Asian equities in the last few sessions. Both the Straits Times Index and Asian shares outside of Japan have also dropped about 4 per cent since Friday when a massive earthquake struck Japan.

‘Hutchison was a bit lucky as it was priced before the Japan earthquake. It should open weakly,’ said Wong Kok Hoi, chief investment officer of Singapore-based APS Asset Management, which manages US$2 billion.

However, weakness in Hutchison Port’s stock price may be a good time for investors looking for yield plays and an exposure to China’s booming trade to scoop up its shares.

Hutchison Port owns and operates ports in Shenzhen and Hong Kong and is aiming to cash in on a recovery in global trade and provide investors with access to China’s booming infrastructure business.

At the offer price of US$1.01, the trust offers a yield of about 5.8 per cent based on its forecasted distribution per unit (DPU) of 5.9 cents for 2011. This compares with a yield of around 7 per cent offered by many Singapore-listed business and property trusts.

Kevin Scully, managing director at NRA capital, said he expects Hutchison Port’s DPU to grow in the coming years.

‘They have capacity expansion coming on this year and in 2015 so that will support future DPU growth. The underlying business of container ports in Hong Kong and Shenzhen and three river ports offer good exposure to the booming Chinese economy,’ said Mr Scully.

The IPO, which takes the form of a business trust, had attracted cornerstone investors including Singapore’s investment company Temasek Holdings, US hedge fund manager Paulson & Co and fund manager Capital Research and Management, which had committed to pour in US$1.6 billion in the deal.

DBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs are joint bookrunners and issue managers for the offering. JPMorgan, UBS, Barclays, and Morgan Stanley are among co-lead managers. — Reuters

REITs – BT

Can Reits weather the turbulence?

REAL estate investment trusts (Reits) have grown increasingly popular over the years due to their attractive tax-exempt dividend income and greater liquidity as compared to physical property assets.

With more people starting to plan for their retirement earlier, many look to Reits as a form of ‘annuity’ that will see them through their golden years.

Even global fund managers have now set up dividend funds to tap the rise of the dividend culture, with Asia taking centrestage.

Notably, recent times have brought about an increased trend among Reits to acquire yield-accretive overseas assets to diversify their earnings base. This acquisition trail tends to be focused more on developed countries, such as Japan, where yields are perceived to be more ‘stable’. But is this really a wise move or a lack of foresight, from a risk management angle? More importantly, are Reits really that resilient to capital downside in times of turmoil while staying capable of sustaining dividend payouts indefinitely into the future?

Let us evaluate this in the context of the latest natural disaster that has hit Japan.

When news of the recent 9.0-magnitude earthquake and tsunami hit newswires last Friday, investors scurried to sell off positions in a broad range of equities, including the once-believed safe-haven Reits.

This led Reits with income and asset exposure to Japan such as Saizen Reit, Parkway Life Reit (P-Life), Mapletree Logistics Trust (MLT), Frasers Commercial Trust and Starhill Global Reit to shed 16.1 per cent, 5.3 per cent, 4.4 per cent, 6.2 per cent and 2.4 per cent respectively since last Friday.

Some feared fluctuations in the Japanese yen may trigger translation losses for Reits. But, in the first place, the more pertinent question to ask is: is the yen more likely to appreciate or depreciate in such a scenario?

Our guess is the yen may appreciate against the greenback in the short term as Japanese investors repatriate funds back to Japan. With hefty insurance payouts also looming on the horizon, the yen could be further boosted as insurance companies quickly liquidate foreign assets to raise cash.

We borrow confidence that this trend will persist in the short term as the yen’s advance last Friday was similar to that experienced after the 1995 Kobe earthquake. As such, income impact – if any – will be more positive than negative for now.

On the asset front, overall damage was also in check as verified by most of the affected Reits. Besides, most Japanese assets tend to be insured against natural disasters. This being so, any fears arising from the need for excessive capital expenditure are probably unwarranted although insurance premiums are likely to increase going forward – an item that is unlikely to materially dent a Reit’s bottom line.

All in all, most of the Reits walked away relatively unscathed, except one: Saizen Reit. It took a hard knock as the trust’s entire asset portfolio consisting of 146 properties is located in Japan, of which 22 properties are situated in worst-hit Sendai. The lack of diversification of its earnings base sent the Reit reeling, with its units plunging a sharp 16.1 per cent or 2-1/2 cents to 13 cents since tragedy struck last Friday.

Fortunately, most of the other Reits with exposure to Japan have diversified portfolios where income streams come from a mix of geographical locations. Analysts reckon income streams for most Reits are not likely to be materially impacted going forward.

Interest rates-wise, the recent disaster that destroyed much of north-east Japan’s infrastructure is more likely to deflate interest rates than inflate them in the short to medium term as the government attempts to keep interest rates near zero while rebuilding the nation.

Our view is further supported by the Japanese central bank’s recent move to inject 15 trillion yen (S$232.4 billion) into the nation’s money markets to promote financial stability and boost overall liquidity.

Reits with debt arising from Japanese assets are therefore likely to continue operating in an ‘idyllic’ low-interest-rate environment, at least in the short to medium term.

Interest rates could, of course, become firmer in the longer term. After all, they are ruled by a function of demand and supply for funds. For instance, if infrastructural demand increases, increased competition for funds may drive up interest rates.

That said, interest rates are unlikely to be able to escalate very much before triggering government intervention as the Japanese government tends to favour less stringent monetary policies that promote liquidity in the nation’s money markets.

To highlight a couple of Reits that could potentially be affected by interest rate movements in Japan, let’s examine P-Life and MLT – the two Singapore-listed Reits with the greatest amount of Japanese borrowings within the Singapore Reit universe.

Both Reits currently still draw bullish ratings from analysts despite their debt exposure to the stricken nation. In particular, P-Life has held up exceptionally well despite a meltdown in regional markets. So far, P-Life has eased 2.4 per cent year-to-date as opposed to the benchmark Straits Times Index (STI), which has declined 7.6 per cent since the beginning of the year.

Analysts such as Janice Ding from CIMB also remain positive on both Reits’ outlook in the times ahead as reiterated by her ‘outperform’ calls on both stocks and target prices of $1.98 and $1.05 for P-Life and MLT respectively – this translates to 23 per cent and 20.7 per cent upside potential for P-Life and MLT respectively, based on yesterday’s closing prices.

So what are our key takeaways from this?

Diversification of earning streams is perhaps one of the key imperatives from a Reit’s risk perspective as reflected in the case of Saizen Reit. Even though Japan is seen as a developed nation that could provide stable yields from its assets and mature economy, too much of a good thing may be bad after all.

Reits that had other sources of income – such as P-Life and MLT – weathered this round of ‘turbulence’ much better than counterparts that did not.

In fact, sharply discounted prices make such Reits look increasingly attractive from a yield perspective. Not only are they resilient in trying times like these, they ‘fill our wallets’ on a regular basis too.

SREITs – OCBC

Impact of Japan’s earthquake & tsunami

Residential REITs. Saizen REIT (Not Rated), with 146 properties all over Japan, will be the most affected S-REIT, in our opinion. The impacted region includes the cities of Sendai with 22 properties, Koriyama and Morioka with three properties each, making up 15.5% of its portfolio value (PV). Most notably, Sendai (nearest quake epicenter) constitutes 11.2% of Saizen’s total portfolio value and 10.6% of rental income. The full extent of the damage is still unknown as access to these areas has been cordoned off due to safety concerns.

Industrial REITs. MLT has 14 properties in Japan (26.4% of PV) of which 13 escaped with either no damage or minimal damage. Sendai Centre (2-storey chilled and frozen facility, contributing 0.75% of PV & 0.7% of MLT’s gross revenue), is located along the coastal area of Sendai, and appears to be most affected. However, the full extent of damage can only be ascertained when access into the property is allowed. The total cost of reinstating the building is ~S$9m (0.37 S-cents per unit), but MLT does not expect the cost of repairs will come to this amount. We place our BUY rating and fair value of S$1.03 under review pending more updates and clarity from management. AAREIT (Not Rated) also has a warehouse at Saitama (4% of PV) to be sold pending sale completion in Mar 2011. AAREIT has announced that there appears to be no structural damage to the property.

Office REITs. FCOT has three commercial properties in Tokyo and Osaka (6.9% of PV). We understand from the manager that all properties are away from the affected areas and thus did not suffer any damages. With FCOT’s limited exposure in Japan, we maintain our BUY rating and fair value of S$0.92.

Retail REITs. Starhill Global REIT has seven malls in Tokyo (6.6% of PV, 4.6% of total gross revenue). The manager has stated that there is no known damage to the malls. In addition, the properties were also partially covered by earthquake insurance (unlike properties in other REIT subsector), providing some form of assurance for unitholders. We expect retail sales in Japan to be impacted somewhat but maintain our BUY rating and target price of S$0.74.

Taking a cautious stance. Nevertheless, we remain cautious as events in Japan are still unfolding and at this stage, it is hard to predict the extent to which the quake and the nuclear fallout will hurt the economy. There is also the possibility of more quakes (likely 7.0 or higher magnitude), aftershocks and even tsunamis taking place in the coming days.

CLT – CIMB

Two properties for S$40m

Maintain Outperform. Cache Logistics has made its maiden acquisition of two thirdparty warehouses for S$39.8m, at 3-5% below valuation and a combined NPI yield of 8%, marginally above its portfolio yield of 7.9%. The deal should add to its DPU with full debt funding. We like the purchases for their shorter lease tenures of about three years that should better position Cache for a rising rental market. We also like the future development potential of the Penjuru property and the reduced dependence and tenant concentration risks for its sponsor, CWT. We keep our DPU estimates and DDM target price of S$1.32 (discount rate 8.4%) as we had factored in S$220m of acquisitions for 2011. We continue to like Cache for its quality portfolio and scalability, expecting more acquisition catalysts. Cache trades at 1.03x P/BV and offers a prospective dividend yield of 10%.

6 Changi North 1. Acquired from APG Distributors (part of Luxasia Group) for S$30.9m or S$175psf GFA (3% below valuation), this 2-storey ramp-up warehouse is located in an established logistics cluster in the Changi North International LogisPark. The property is 100% leased to three tenants which include the vendor APC, which will lease back one-third of the building and occupy an additional 27,00sf when this space becomes available. The other two tenants, a multinational electronics manufacturing service provider and a logistics service provider, will take up 50% and 16% of NLA for varying lease periods. Weighted average lease expiry is about 3.3 years, fairly short against Cache’s portfolio average of 6.4 years. We estimate passing rent of S$1.16psf/month, marginally below the S$1.20-1.40psf for Cache’s Changi Districentre.

4 Penjuru Lane. Acquired from Kim Heng Tubular Pte Ltd for S$8.9m or S$162psf on GFA (5% below valuation), this single-storey warehouse is approved for chemical and dangerous goods storage. It will be leased back to the vendor for three years, with an option for a further three years. An annual rent step-up of 2% has been structured in the lease. We estimate passing rent of S$1.08psf/month, fairly in line with Cache’s Commodity Hub in the same vicinity, at S$1.05psf.

Comments

We are positive on the acquisition for a number of reasons, including:

1) DPU accretion. The spread between NPI yields and cost of funding is slightly wider at 50bp above our projection. Accretion over last year’s annualised DPU is about 3%.

2) Development potential. We see development potential for the Penjuru asset which has an un-maximised plot ratio of 0.63. At the maximum plot ratio of 2.5, there could be an additional 163,000sf of NLA for extraction, quadrupling its current size. Nonetheless, we expect redevelopment work only in the medium term.

3) Shorter tenure to capture rising rental market. Unlike its IPO assets, the new acquisitions come with much shorter leases of about three years (portfolio average of 6.4 years). This would better position Cache for capturing a rising rental market, in our view.

4) Lower cost of debt. Management indicated a lower cost than the current 4.4% for its 3-year unsecured term loan. We anticipate interest cost of about 3%, below our forecast of 3.5%.

5) Third-party acquisitions, signalling the manager’s efforts to seek out deals independent from its sponsor. We note that the pricing of the two acquisitions on a unit-price basis is also lower than its IPO assets in the same vicinity.

6) Dilutes tenant concentration risks for CWT. Thus far, Cache is wholly dependent on its sponsor CWT for its rental income. With this acquisition, tenant concentration risks would be diluted, although overall contributions from these two third parties are still small at about 7% of NPI.

Valuation and recommendation

Asset leverage to rise to 27.6%. With full debt financing from a 3-year unsecured term loan, asset leverage should rise to about 28% from 23% after the acquisition. Cache’s asset leverage is capped at 35% without a credit rating. However, we believe it would not be difficult for Cache to obtain a credit when it needs to gear beyond this level. Portfolio size will increase 5% to S$784m after the transaction.

Maintain Outperform. Our positive view on this acquisition is tempered by the small quantum of the deal size. No changes to our DPU estimates and DDM target price of S$1.32 (discount rate 8.4%) as we had factored in S$220m of acquisitions for 2011. We anticipate further acquisition catalysts this year. Cache trades at 1.03x P/BV and a prospective forward yield of 10%.

HPH Trust – BT

HPH Trust to price IPO at US$1.01, rake in US$5.5b

The IPO ranks as the biggest worldwide so far this year: Dealogic

Hutchison Port Holdings Trust (HPH Trust) will be raising some US$5.5 billion from its initial public offering (IPO) in Singapore after pricing its units at US$1.01 apiece – a level in line with that cited by reports earlier.

According to data provider Dealogic, the IPO is the largest globally so far this year, and has boosted the IPO volume on Singapore Exchange (SGX) to more than 17 times that seen in the same period last year.

HPH Trust settled on the offer price yesterday, days after Reuters said that the trust had narrowed the price range amid growing investor caution. That range was reportedly shrunk to US$0.99- US$1.03, from US$0.91- US$1.08.

The offer price of US$1.01 lies right in the middle of the new range. Investors applying for units under the public offer will pay the Singapore-dollar equivalent of S$1.294 per unit. Trading of the units on SGX is expected to start on Friday.

There will be around 3.8 billion units under the global offering, and another 1.6 billion units for cornerstone investors.

The pricing of HPH Trust units has come under close scrutiny, with the market watching it for signs of how investment sentiment has been holding up.

Continuing political upheaval in the Middle East coupled with Japan’s deadly earthquake rattled Singapore’s stock market yesterday, causing the Straits Times Index to slide 12.63 points to 3,030.86.

The market will be a little ‘sceptical’, seeing that HPH Trust could not price its units at the higher end of the range, said Sias Research vice-president Roger Tan. They might ask if ‘the macro factors have affected the take-up rate’, he reckoned.

There is, nevertheless, some cause for cheer. Dealogic said yesterday that HPH Trust’s listing brought the IPO volume on SGX so far this year to US$5.55 billion. This is 17.8 times that of the US$311 million raised in the same period last year.

In fact, this year’s IPO volume is pushing close to that for the whole of 2010, which was US$5.63 billion.

Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and DBS – joint bookrunners, lead managers and issue managers for the HPH Trust IPO – are now ranked first, second and fourth respectively in Dealogic’s Asia ex-Japan equity capital markets league table.

Net cash proceeds from HPH Trust’s listing will go towards cutting Hutchison Whampoa Ltd’s (HWL) net debt to net total capital ratio to around 20 per cent this year.

HPH Trust will hold port assets in Hong Kong and Shenzhen, China. It is sponsored by Hutchison Port Holdings, a subsidiary of HWL.